<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Challenges</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nesota.com/blog/archives/32/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nesota.com/blog/archives/32</link>
	<description>Entrepreneurship in the North Star State</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 03:17:05 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.nesota.com/blog/archives/32/comment-page-1#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 21:33:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nesota.com/blog/?p=32#comment-30</guid>
		<description>Photoshop&#039;s &quot;sharpness&quot; tools don&#039;t really deblur images; rather, they increase the local contrast.  They are of little use for dealing with anything other than minor blurs, and they are virtually useless when blur caused by motion is anything but a straight line.  What&#039;s more, the optimal amount of &quot;sharpness&quot; provided by the Photoshop tools is tied to the desired output medium.  Images sharpened for use on screen will often appear to have halos or other artifacts when printed on paper.

In short, Unsharp Mask and Smart Sharpen serve only to increase the acutance of an image.  The tool I&#039;m developing will actually remove the blur, revealing the latent sharp image.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Photoshop&#8217;s &#8220;sharpness&#8221; tools don&#8217;t really deblur images; rather, they increase the local contrast.  They are of little use for dealing with anything other than minor blurs, and they are virtually useless when blur caused by motion is anything but a straight line.  What&#8217;s more, the optimal amount of &#8220;sharpness&#8221; provided by the Photoshop tools is tied to the desired output medium.  Images sharpened for use on screen will often appear to have halos or other artifacts when printed on paper.</p>
<p>In short, Unsharp Mask and Smart Sharpen serve only to increase the acutance of an image.  The tool I&#8217;m developing will actually remove the blur, revealing the latent sharp image.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alex</title>
		<link>http://www.nesota.com/blog/archives/32/comment-page-1#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 06:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nesota.com/blog/?p=32#comment-29</guid>
		<description>so uh, is it going to be better than the photoshop one?  i think you&#039;re going to need human input to distinguish yourself from automatic tools.  i&#039;m guessing something like a RAW interpolation UI.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so uh, is it going to be better than the photoshop one?  i think you&#8217;re going to need human input to distinguish yourself from automatic tools.  i&#8217;m guessing something like a RAW interpolation UI.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
